House of M

I've just read House of M (Brian Michael Bendis) for the third time, and I'm still not sure what I think of it.

The miniseries picks up more or less where Bendis' Avengers Disassembled arc left off. Wanda Maximoff (the Avenger Scarlet Witch, and daughter of X-Men arch-foe Magneto) has been driven mad by her reality-altering mutant powers. Several of her Avengers teammates have died because of her breakdown, and the remaining Avengers and X-Men are no longer sure they can help her. Just as the two teams come together to decide what can be done for their friend, the world goes white, and suddenly everyone's living in Magneto's world. The war Magneto foresaw between men and mutants has apparently come and gone, and now the Earth is one big shiny-happy mutant-friendly society run by the "House of M" - Magneto and his children.

The heroes of the Marvel universe have all been given the lives they've always dreamed about: Peter Parker is married to Gwen Stacy and his Uncle Ben is still around, Captain America never got frozen in the ice and got to grow old with his own generation, Wolverine is a top S.H.I.E.L.D. agent and now remembers his entire life. Yet this also makes Wolverine one of the few who remembers the real Marvel universe, and realizes that he's starring on Extreme Makeover: Planetary Edition. He hooks up with a human underground movement - it turns out not everyone's happy with Magneto's leadership after all - and together they set out to wake up the heroes, find the Unwicked Witch of the Crazy, and Put Things Right.

Every time I've read this story, I've found it gripping. It begins and ends with a surprisingly down-to-Earth family drama. Beneath the capes and masks, it's a story about a family coming together in despair, struggling to cope with a loved one's mental illness. The issues in the middle, in the world Wanda creates, are on the surface a fairly standard heroes-trapped-in-fake-reality adventure, the kind we've seen in any number of comics as well as on Star Trek and in movies like The Matrix or Dark City. Yet it's also a story about Wanda's response to her family's and friends' grief and her attempt to repair the pain she has caused them all and give them the world they deserve. The dialogue is clever but heartfelt (it's Bendis); the action is big, brassy and exciting.

But House of M raises several huge, intriguing questions, and I find myself wanting more, or different, answers than Bendis gives us. Upon realizing reality has been changed, the heroes have only one short debate about whether or not they should try to change it back. Kitty Pryde and Jessica Drew ask why it isn't just as wrong to unmake this reality, to take away these lives people are living - why, in a world of fantastic superhuman powers, this change couldn't be something that's supposed to happen - and are immediately shot down by Wolverine and the rest on sheer principle. No one talks about how life is worse for some in this reality, or about the racism of mutant rule, or about the people who are dead in this world but alive in the other (or vice versa). It's just taken as a given that when someone magically changes the world, it's your job to change it right back. And maybe that is a given - in America, at least. In our democratic society, we tend to hold free will above all other virtues. The idea that one single man, or family, could enforce a whole new reality on the world, even a reality that made most people's lives better, is anathema to most of us.

Yet Wanda didn't impose her own ideas on the world, or even her father's. Supposedly she linked with Charles Xavier's mind and got him to tap into everyone's dreams and hopes and wishes, and used that to give people the lives they all wanted. It's a brilliant storytelling device, exploring the characters in the regular Marvel reality by seeing the lives they would have chosen to live in this one. It was great fodder for other Marvel writers, too, who followed these lives in tie-in stories. But like Jessica Drew asks, if everyone got what they wanted, not just Magneto, than why is it necessarily wrong to just let it go?

Of course, not quite everyone got what they wanted: while some of the dead have risen again in this new world, others alive in the regular Marvel U are deceased here. Was it because people like Charles Xavier and Reed and Sue Richards would've figured out the truth too quickly? Or were some people's dreams were granted primacy over others, meaning that Magneto and Doctor Doom really don't see the world as big enough for themselves and their superhero nemeses?

It also seems as though Wanda plays favorites - or at least I prefer to think so rather than suggesting that Bendis' own power couple Luke Cage and Jessica Jones got separated in this new reality because of some relationship angst from one or both of them. It's implied that Jessica Jones is with Ant-Man Scott Lang in the M-verse. Scott was one of the Avengers killed during Wanda's Disassembled breakdown, so I think giving Scott back his ex was Wanda's gift to him.

I also really wanted to know - or wanted a character to ask - why Magneto's world had to turn out like it did. Wanda blames her father near the end, suggesting that his petty and cruel nature made a petty and cruel world, even when he ruled it. But is Magneto so petty and so cruel? I've always thought that Magneto believed he had to be a harsh man in a harsh world, but that did not mean he would choose it. I've always believed he wanted the same world of harmony and cooperation Charles Xavier wants; Magneto simply didn't believe it was a realistic goal. If Wanda is reaching into her father's head and remaking the world for him, why couldn't she create the kinder, gentler Xavier version of reality? Do her powers, or her madness even, demand a certain amount of logic and consistency, a world the inhabitants can still believe is real? Does this mean that she changed only history, not human nature, and that Wanda couldn't believe in Xavier's dream any more than Magneto could?

I could answer all these questions myself. I could spend days answering them, really. (I have a BA in English Lit, I'm marrying a woman with a BA in Philosophy, we write this blog, hi!). But I wanted the characters to put a few more of them on the table themselves before they rushed into their big fight scene. Yes, great drama sets up a debate and lets the audience answer, but if the characters don't ask enough of the questions for themselves, then they start to feel a little too much like plot devices rather than people. It's a very tricky tightrope to walk, and I don't think Bendis got it quite right with House of M. Still, there's a lot to be said for any story that lives so vividly in my head for days after a third reading.

- JC